<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Structured Settlements Authority</title>
<link>http://structuredsettlementauthority.com/</link>
<description>Independent news and information on structured settlements. Resource articles on how to sell structured settlement payments for cash and choose a settlement company.</description>
<language>en</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2008</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2008 00:07:22 -0700</lastBuildDate>
<generator>http://www.movabletype.org/?v=3.17</generator>
<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs> 

<item>
<title>Rethinking Structured Settlements</title>
<description><![CDATA[Structured settlements have been around for a long time, our site has been a resource for those looking for information in different states and during different periods. New legislation may take some of the profiteering out of selling structured settlements and along with governmental leadership there are a few dos and don'ts that everyone should know.<br />
<br />
Note: This is just the first half of our suggestions for Structured Settlement reform, more to come later this week.<br />
<ol><br />
<li>Introducing a government assisted educational track for tort victims might help them decide on a long term plan instead of going directly to settlement payments.</li><br />
<li>New laws creating stricter regulations on advertising structured settlements, this could go hand in hand with educational options</li><br />
<li>When it comes down to it we might just need some better leadership from the Better leadership from the NASP (National Association of Settlement Purchasers) who are sponsoring all of this confusion and harmful profiteering, there is certainly room for education and profit in the industry and a wise company leader could step up to assume that role. this might also tie into voluntary educational assistance programs or semi-settlements which offer a lump sum along with a partial payment (so settlers aren't completely helpless if they spend their money)</li><br />
<li>Development of a NASP (national association of settlement purchasers) website that could help to inform and update the public. Right now there is nothing above the fold on Google for the search "NASP" that even relates to structured settlements (NASP is a very common acronym).</li><br />
</ol>]]></description>
<link>http://structuredsettlementauthority.com/news/2008/04/15/index.html#000358</link>
<guid>http://structuredsettlementauthority.com/news/2008/04/15/index.html#000358</guid>
<category></category>
<pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2008 00:07:22 -0700</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>A Structured Settlement May Not Be the Right Answer</title>
<description><![CDATA[Structured settlements are great at providing long term financial security to personal injury victims.  Structured agreements provide predictable payments that are received tax free. Usually an agreed upon structured settlement payment plan is well thought out and it does not makes sense to change it. However in some cases a financial or family emergency can strains the financial resources of the injured party and in those moments some people choose to sell structured settlement payments for cash.<br />
<br />
In emergencies the structured nature of settlement payments becomes restrictive and does not accommodate the flexibility needed to address major financial emergencies. If you find yourself in this position it is wise to seek the help of professionals including structured settlement brokers, lawyers, and financial advisors.  You will want to learn as much as you can and also to compare the offers of several companies before you make any decision.  Remember you are in control, make an informed decision that is right for you.]]></description>
<link>http://structuredsettlementauthority.com/news/2006/07/31/index.html#000355</link>
<guid>http://structuredsettlementauthority.com/news/2006/07/31/index.html#000355</guid>
<category></category>
<pubDate>Mon, 31 Jul 2006 16:55:35 -0700</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>How to Get Cash for a Structured Settlement</title>
<description><![CDATA[If you received an award in a personal injury case, you may have opted to receive a series of periodic structured settlement payments rather than receiving a lump sum of cash up front. The payments are usually received as a tax free annuities and are paid by an independent third party.  In most cases this is the end of the process but in some instances people can have a change of mind or in needs and then decide they would rather have cash for a structure settlement.<br />
<br />
There are many companies that offer cash for structured settlements and they have a variety of programs that will allow you to access any portion of your annuity. You may want to sell the payment rights for just a few years and receive a partial cash lumpsum while still retaining a portion of your monthly payments. Alternatively, you could sell your structured settlement payment rights for a single payment. You really have the control to customize an arrangement to get cash for a structured settlement based on your unique needs.  This is an important decision that has legal and financial consequences to be sure to consult your advisors prior to making a final decision.  During the process learn as much as you can and get several free quotes and compare offers to make sure you get the most cash for you settlement annuity payments.]]></description>
<link>http://structuredsettlementauthority.com/news/2006/07/29/index.html#000354</link>
<guid>http://structuredsettlementauthority.com/news/2006/07/29/index.html#000354</guid>
<category></category>
<pubDate>Sat, 29 Jul 2006 16:43:43 -0700</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Legal Aspects of Getting Cash for a Structured Settlement</title>
<description><![CDATA[If you have ever considered getting cash for your structured settlement, you may first want to contact a lawyer and financial advisor. There are specific regulations in most states that restrict the sale of structured settlements.  You will also need court approval to receive cash for your structured settlement or be subject to a severe penalty tax. Restrictions at the federal level can also affect the sale of structured settlements to a third party individual and some insurance companies won't transfer annuities to third parties.  <br />
<br />
Because of all of these complexities it is always a good idea to seek professional assistance. It is also a good idea to compare several free quotes when you seek cash for a structured settlement.  Do your homework and check out multiple companies to see which one can offer you the most cash for your structured settlement. Beyond the money you will receive you also should consider the integrity, reputation and track record of the company. Receiving cash for a structured settlement can seem very appealing, especially if you need a lump sum of money to satisfy your immediate needs but remember to have the patience to get the help you need prior to making your final decision.]]></description>
<link>http://structuredsettlementauthority.com/news/2006/07/25/index.html#000353</link>
<guid>http://structuredsettlementauthority.com/news/2006/07/25/index.html#000353</guid>
<category></category>
<pubDate>Tue, 25 Jul 2006 15:50:43 -0700</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>NSSTA 2006 Annual Meeting</title>
<description><![CDATA[Last May the National Structured Settlement Trade Association (NSSTA) held their annual meeting, for the first time in Puerto Rico. The meeting featured speakers on various structured settlement topics, educational sessions as well as a business meeting.<br />
<br />
NSSTA is a non-profit organization headquartered in Washington, D.C. with a membership consisting of more than 700 structured settlement professionals including: brokers; annuity and trust providers; liability insurers; and attorneys who specialize in structured settlement agreements.<br />
<br />
During the meeting adopted a new mission statement, amended as follows. The primary mission of the Association shall be to promote the establishment and preservation of structured settlements in order to provide long-term financial security to personal injury claimants and their families through periodic payment of compensation.  The Association also shall promote utilization of periodic payment arrangements generally as a tool for resolving claims.  The Association shall carry out its mission through public advocacy, legislative action and educational programs<br />
<br />
The NSSTA also reported on the progress of its Broker Relationship Initiative, which was created in 2005. The stated purposes of this initiative is to determine how we can strengthen the future of structured settlements for the benefit of all concerned and identify and, where we can appropriately, discuss and address key issues of concern to the structured settlement industry.]]></description>
<link>http://structuredsettlementauthority.com/news/2006/07/23/index.html#000352</link>
<guid>http://structuredsettlementauthority.com/news/2006/07/23/index.html#000352</guid>
<category></category>
<pubDate>Sun, 23 Jul 2006 10:12:00 -0700</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Seek Financial Advice about Structured Settlements</title>
<description><![CDATA[Structured settlements are complex and the costs involved with selling a settlement vary with the buyer. If you hire a settlement broker, they are paid a commission by the buyer, which in reality is funded by a deduction in the payment to the seller. While there is a cost, gaining the services of a broker can also have advantages in that they expose prospective sellers to the maximum number of buyers. Structured settlement brokers can have considerable knowledge in the field, which they can share with the lawyer or financial advisor of a seller. Settlement brokers also work to ensure that the sale progresses smoothly. Sellers should always do their homework and compare multiple companies so that they can choose an honest buyer and get the most cash for the sale of their structured payments. Usually there are no out-of-pocket expenses for a person selling a structured settlement; the buyers normally deduct their portion and the cost of the legal expenses before paying the lump sum.<br />
<br />
If you are considering selling your structured settlement to get access to some cash, you will usually have a number of alternatives to choose from.  It is possible to sell either a part of or their entire settlement annuity. You may want to only sell a few years’ worth of structured settlement payments and also keep some of the benefits of regular payments through the remaining structured settlements.<br />
<br />
Because of all these complexities, it is in the interest of the seller to seek out the advice of a lawyer and financial advisor who can guide him regarding the various legal and tax requirements that often vary from state to state. In addition to state laws there are federal regulations that also govern the sale of structured settlements. In some cases insurance companies will not pay the annuities to anyone except the original beneficiary. Laws also require buyers to show the value of settlement sold broken down into the amount paid, and the difference between it and the sum of the future payments. A court will only approve the sale of a structured settlement if it is convinced that the sale is in the best interests of the recipient and his dependents. If the court approves the sale of structured settlement, the proceeds will be tax free for both the buyer and the seller.  As you can see, the best advice is to seek our professional help before making any decision regarding the sale of all or part of your structured settlement payments.]]></description>
<link>http://structuredsettlementauthority.com/news/2006/07/21/index.html#000351</link>
<guid>http://structuredsettlementauthority.com/news/2006/07/21/index.html#000351</guid>
<category></category>
<pubDate>Fri, 21 Jul 2006 09:53:48 -0700</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Accidents are Uncontrollable, Structured Settlements Are</title>
<description><![CDATA[Medical malpractice is a fact of life and accidents do happen. Even though they are difficult to accept life is full of tragedies. I a brief moment, forces beyond your control can result in an accident that can change your life forever. In reality, this happens every day; only you think it cannot happen to you. While you may not be able to control these accidents, there is a legal system in place that allows victims to structure legal settlements to provide for a series of payment that can help you lessen the burden of these events in future years. <br />
<br />
If you are an accident victim or have suffered as the result of someone else's negligence, you can get an attorney and go to court to receive a legal settlement. Rather than choosing a large lump sum payment, you now have the option to choose a Structured Settlement, which will allow you to receive a series of future annuity payments on a defined schedule over the course of the agreement. <br />
<br />
Structured settlements are annuity usually paid by large insurance companies, purchased by defendant to make the payments to you, which were agreed upon in the court settlement. <br />
<br />
Structured settlement payment annuities were created is to protect person getting the money, from spending the money too quickly or in a reckless manner. A structured agreement helps the victim avoid jeopardizing his or her own future financial well being. <br />
<br />
While you will never be able to eliminate the possibility of an accident or malpractice, are things you can control afterwards. If tragedy strikes, you can choose to receive a series of futures payments under a structured settlement agreement rather than a large cash sum. This type of agreement might be in your best interests, if you change your mind, you can always sell your structured settlement and get access to your cash now.  As always, it is best to be prepared and informed. Protect you and your family by finding out more about structured annuities and structured settlement payment agreements.]]></description>
<link>http://structuredsettlementauthority.com/news/2006/07/19/index.html#000350</link>
<guid>http://structuredsettlementauthority.com/news/2006/07/19/index.html#000350</guid>
<category></category>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jul 2006 09:28:01 -0700</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>$350,000 Structured Settlement Proposed for Shooting</title>
<description><![CDATA[A sheriff's deputy's accidental shooting of a 19-year-old woman in June 2004 will cost county taxpayers more than $350,000 under the terms of a proposed structured settlement payment agreement. <br />
<br />
Tabitha DeSousa went to a Minnehaha-area residence to use methamphetamine and ended up with two severed leg arteries and a bone shattered into 16 pieces when she was hit by a .45-caliber bullet fired by Deputy Don Slagle. He was trying to shoot DeSousa's dog. <br />
<br />
Slagle and Deputy John O'Mara went to the house, at 5717 N.E. 45th Ave., on the evening of June 26, 2004, after a complaint that a handgun and drug paraphernalia had been spotted inside the residence, which was being sold and was supposed to be vacant. <br />
<br />
Deputies and several witnesses said the animal charged the deputies; others said the animal was merely running to its owner. All of some nine or 10 witnesses interviewed for a sheriff's investigation said DeSousa screamed "Don't shoot my dog" and moved in some fashion, perhaps to place herself between the deputies and the dog, when she was hit. <br />
<br />
The structured settlement agreement is on the county commissioners' Tuesday consent agenda and is related to DeSousa's injury and her claim that she was arrested without probable cause and negligently wounded. A staff report says: "These claims are disputed, but it is agreed that the injury to Ms. DeSousa was serious." <br />
<br />
And so is the damage to taxpayers, under the terms of the structured settlement the county agreed to:  Payment of $108,356.27 in medical expenses, a $150,000 cash lump sum payment, and a $100,000 structured settlement annuity with payments scheduled through Dec. 31, 2026.<br />
<a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.columbian.com/news/localNews/06242006news38469.cfm" style="font-size:9px; text-decoration:none; color:#000000">Source: ColumbianNews.com Saturday, June 24, 2006</a>]]></description>
<link>http://structuredsettlementauthority.com/news/2006/07/17/index.html#000349</link>
<guid>http://structuredsettlementauthority.com/news/2006/07/17/index.html#000349</guid>
<category></category>
<pubDate>Mon, 17 Jul 2006 08:01:53 -0700</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>SEC Considers Settlement Structure With TV Azteca</title>
<description><![CDATA[A potential settlement has been structured as the result of conversations between TV Azteca, S.A. de C.V. (BMV: TVAZTCA; Latibex: XTZA), one of the two largest producers of Spanish language television programming in the world and the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC).  Conversations regarding the structured settlement were previously undisclosed, but now it appears that terms for a potential settlement agreement has been structured. The proposed settlement will be reviewed by the SEC, which anticipates reaching a conclusion as to whether to proceed within 90 days.<br />
<br />
The structured of the proposed settlement, if accepted by the SEC, would not entail economic consequences for TV Azteca. Ricardo B. Salinas and Pedro Padilla would bear the monetary costs resulting from this proposal.<br />
<a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.hispanicbusiness.com/news/newsbyid.asp?id=36891" style="font-size:9px; text-decoration:none; color:#000000">Source: HispanicBusiness.com</a>]]></description>
<link>http://structuredsettlementauthority.com/news/2006/07/15/index.html#000348</link>
<guid>http://structuredsettlementauthority.com/news/2006/07/15/index.html#000348</guid>
<category></category>
<pubDate>Sat, 15 Jul 2006 07:45:39 -0700</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Bonneville Structures Settlement with California Edison</title>
<description><![CDATA[The Bonneville Power Administration has reached agreement with Southern California Edison on the proposed structure of a settlement to two lawsuits resulting from the Western energy crisis five years ago.<br />
<br />
If the settlement structure is approved, Bonneville will pay Edison future payments of $28.5 million plus interest to resolve legal claims against the agency totaling about $208 million.<br />
<br />
The lawsuits in the U.S. Court of Federal Claims grew out of a dispute over terms of a 1988 power sales contract during the crisis.<br />
<br />
Payments under the settlement would be made only after resolution of separate litigation over California refunds for claims and lawsuits resulting from the energy crisis in 2000-01.<br />
<br />
The proposed Edison settlement is structured so that payment will be made only when the California refund proceedings are resolved and the net amount, if any, due to BPA has been received in its entirety, officials said.<br />
<br />
“The settlement would help put the fallout of the West Coast energy crisis behind us,” said Steve Wright, Bonneville administrator. “It would protect Northwest ratepayers while re-establishing a collaborative business relationship with an important business partner in California.”<br />
<a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.oregonnews.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20060609/BUSINESS/60609002&template=printart" style="font-size:9px; text-decoration:none; color:#000000">Source: OregonNews.com</a>]]></description>
<link>http://structuredsettlementauthority.com/news/2006/07/13/index.html#000347</link>
<guid>http://structuredsettlementauthority.com/news/2006/07/13/index.html#000347</guid>
<category></category>
<pubDate>Thu, 13 Jul 2006 07:33:30 -0700</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Power Authority OKs Settlement Structure</title>
<description><![CDATA[The structured of a hard-fought settlement between the New York Power Authority and local governments was approved Tuesday afternoon. <br />
<br />
Power Authority officials formally approved the structured of a $279 million, 50-year settlement annuity that will see the bulk of the funds allocated towards waterfront development efforts in both Erie and Niagara counties. The first settlement proposal tendered by NYPA was a $100 million, 50-year package of payments. <br />
<br />
"Just one year ago this community stood up and demanded a fair and equitable settlement in the 50-year relicensing agreement with the New York Power Authority," said Rep. Brian Higgins, in a prepared release. <br />
<br />
"Today, the NYPA board approved the settlement we fought for, representing three times their original offer," Higgins' said. <br />
<br />
The structured of the settlement was considered crucial to NYPA in its effort to gain federal relicensing approval for its power plant operations in the Town of Lewiston. <br />
<br />
"We structured the settlement so to get the highest and best use of this new waterfront money, restricting its use to design and construction of physical improvements along the Buffalo waterfront," Higgins said.<br />
<a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.bizjournals.com/buffalo/stories/2006/06/26/daily22.html" style="font-size:9px; text-decoration:none; color:#000000">Source: Business First of Buffalo - June 27, 2006</a>]]></description>
<link>http://structuredsettlementauthority.com/news/2006/07/11/index.html#000346</link>
<guid>http://structuredsettlementauthority.com/news/2006/07/11/index.html#000346</guid>
<category></category>
<pubDate>Tue, 11 Jul 2006 07:10:47 -0700</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Structure of Boeing Settlement Questioned</title>
<description><![CDATA[Boeing may face congressional hearings into the structure of its $615 million settlement of ethics charges with the government if the company is allowed to make tax deductible payments for the fine.<br />
<br />
"We are very concerned about the possibility that this settlement may be structured in a way that allows for payments made by the settling company to be tax deductible, thereby leaving the American taxpayer to effectively subsidize its misconduct," Sens. Charles E. Grassley of Iowa, John W. Warner of Virginia and John McCain of Arizona wrote in a letter to Attorney General Alberto R. Gonzales, dated June 29.<br />
<br />
The letter asks Gonzales for an analysis of the tax treatment of the settlement structure and whether the annuity payments may be covered by Boeing's insurers. The information will "help us to determine the appropriateness" of hearings, the letter said. It requests a response by Wednesday or before the settlement is executed, whichever is sooner.<br />
<a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/07/07/AR2006070701434.html" style="font-size:9px; text-decoration:none; color:#000000">Source: Washington Post, July 8, 2006</a]]></description>
<link>http://structuredsettlementauthority.com/news/2006/07/09/index.html#000345</link>
<guid>http://structuredsettlementauthority.com/news/2006/07/09/index.html#000345</guid>
<category></category>
<pubDate>Sun, 09 Jul 2006 06:59:31 -0700</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Considerations in Settlement Structures</title>
<description><![CDATA[A structured settlement allows the payment of funds owed to a recipient to be paid in an agreed upon way. Settlement payments are often structured in cases such as personal injury lawsuits. A structured settlement agreement payments to be made in customized installments rather than in a large, lump sum.<br />
<br />
There are several factors to consider in deciding if a structured settlement is the right choice for you.<br />
<br />
Usually a lump sum will be worth less than the payments received over time. However, in some cases this can be more beneficial to a specific individual.  Normally, a structured settlement will allow you to receive monthly payments as opposed to one large lump sum<br />
<br />
Tax advantages are another consideration.  Structured settlement payments have tax advantages compared to a lump sum payment. Normally the structure results in a lower amount of money going to taxes. <br />
<br />
If an individual is on disability, is incapable of work or has become incompetent, a structured settlement would be a good way to provide for long term support. In some cases monthly payments can be arranged to allow care throughout the recipients life time. <br />
<br />
In cases where a wrongful death a structured annuity can also be agreed upon to provide ongoing support for the spouse and/or children to allow for compensation of the lost wage earner.<br />
<br />
Structured payments can also be tailored to match the ongoing need to make certain payments. Payments needed for mortgages, car loans, and medical expenses are typical. <br />
<br />
In essence, a structured settlement allows an individual to receive customized payments instead of a single lump sum. A lump sum allows for more money right away, where a structured settlement provides a predetermined series of payments over a specified period of years. <br />
<br />
It is up to the individual to determine which is the right solution for you. You may wish to discuss it with your family, attorney, and financial advisors prior to deciding if a structured settlement is right for you.]]></description>
<link>http://structuredsettlementauthority.com/news/2006/07/08/index.html#000344</link>
<guid>http://structuredsettlementauthority.com/news/2006/07/08/index.html#000344</guid>
<category></category>
<pubDate>Sat, 08 Jul 2006 17:03:07 -0700</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Structured Personal Injury Settlements</title>
<description><![CDATA[Personal injury lawsuits often result in agreements for structured settlement payments. These are agreements where you agree to accept periodic payments in the future in exchange for releasing the liability of your claim today. Structured settlements can provide almost any manner and timing of payments that you may choose. The cash from a structured settlement may be paid in annual installments over a number of years, or just every few years, or even as a future lump sum.<br />
<br />
Once the timing and structure of these payments has be agreed upon, the payments are generally facilitated through the purchase of one or more annuities from a life insurance company. So the money paid actually comes from a reputable and secure company rather than directly from the defendant.]]></description>
<link>http://structuredsettlementauthority.com/news/2006/07/02/index.html#000356</link>
<guid>http://structuredsettlementauthority.com/news/2006/07/02/index.html#000356</guid>
<category></category>
<pubDate>Sun, 02 Jul 2006 17:04:34 -0700</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>The Role of a Structured Settlement Company</title>
<description><![CDATA[If you have been a victim of malfeasance, have been severely injured and are no longer able to physically work, you may be offered a structured settlement as compensation.  This is the point where a structured settlement company can play a vital role. Settlement companies have demonstrated their ability to reduce the rising costs of personal injury settlements and costly litigation. These companies help facilitate the settlement claims in a quick and efficient manner, in many cases eliminating the need for time consuming and costly litigation. By fostering an agreement focused on the victims future needs in constructive manner less money is wasted on litigation which leaves more funds available for the beneficiary. In a structured agreement a series of settlement payments are paid over time as an annuity rather than as a cash lump sum. This arrangement helps to prevent the dissipation of funds, which often occurs in cash settlements, and provides guaranteed benefits that will be available for the beneficiarys future needs.<br />
<br />
Roles played and action taken by the settlement specialist during each step of the structured settlement process: <br />
<br />
The specialist will review the entire claim file and help document and define existing and future damages.  The focus is on the plaintiffs future needs and making a recommendation of how a series of periodic payments can be used to meet those needs and also facilitate the settlement process. A complete estimate of the future medical expenditures and loss of earning capability is included in this complete analysis of anticipated needs.  This is especially important in catastrophic cases where the injuries sustained deprive the victim the ability to physically work.<br />
<br />
The structured settlement company will also look for and then assess medical information related to impaired life expectancy due to the accident.  This impaired-life rating is important in that it may enhance the benefit stream to the beneficiary since their life expectancy has been reduced.  While this calculation may sound morbid it is important.  Having a 30 year annuity with lower payments is of less value to a person with a life expectancy of 15 years.  They would be better served by a 15 year structured settlement with higher benefit payments. <br />
<br />
After all the constraints have been identified, a specific proposal is developed.  Structured settlements are completely customizable and the payments can be structured to precisely fit the needs of an individual case.  This is one of the many benefits of structured agreements. A well written proposal will address the liability of the defendant and the specific needs of the claimant. <br />
<br />
The proposal is used as a starting point in the structured settlement negotiation process. The settlement specialist can provide assistance throughout the negotiation process by provide their perspective and judgment which they have gained through years of training and experience.<br />
<br />
After the structured agreement has been reached various legal documents will need to be prepared.  This will involve a series of reviews and each time the draft will be modified until the final version has been reached and the documents can be released.]]></description>
<link>http://structuredsettlementauthority.com/news/2005/11/10/index.html#000343</link>
<guid>http://structuredsettlementauthority.com/news/2005/11/10/index.html#000343</guid>
<category></category>
<pubDate>Thu, 10 Nov 2005 07:53:51 -0700</pubDate>
</item>


</channel>
</rss>